August 27, 2005
-
Ok, the whole Dragonfly thing is getting out of hand quickly.
I was at work this evening and one of my co-workers goes, “So when are you and Dragonfly getting married?” And I go “where the hell’d that come from?” and he’s like “she’s got a huge crush on you” and I’m like “I have a theory” But the poor boy wouldn’t believe my theory. I think she just might be doing it to make her sister jealous, but there are a number of factors that don’t add up. I thought this because she was calling her sister (who also works down there) a slut. When I asked her why, she wouldn’t tell me. Oh well. The death nail in my theory is that the sister thing just started tonight whereas she was all hyper and such about three weeks ago. In the words of Howton, *sigh*
If she likes me she must be rather shy about it. Either that or Daddy’s already stepped in and told her that I’m a bad guy without ever meeting him. Who knows? We’ve only went out (if you can call it that) once and she’s yet to call me, let alone kiss me. Frankly I don’t care either way. I mean, if she’s really into me, fine, I’ve got someone I can call to hang out with. If she doesn’t, I can move on.
The irony of course is that about five minutes after the crush comment, a different co-worker goes “Dragonfly’s hot. I think I might ask her out on a date.” to which I replied sarcastically, “Good luck.” It irked me thought that he thought that he could ask her out. Guess I had the whole ownership/property thing going on in my head. The point is, I don’t really care cause she isn’t available when I am. Wonderful girl? Yes. Someone I think about when I’m masturbating? Only when I’m feeling devious.
*sigh*
Comments (22)
You should call her. Girls like when guys call them.
alas, I never got her number, but she has mine.
Ok, I take back what I said last post. This is an example of the PERFECT time to use code. Yikes dude.
LOL, Howton takes back a comment!
This thread is useless without pictures.
Pictures of what? Dragonfly? I sure hope that’s what you meant, because I found two distinct subject matters above, and I certinly don’t want photographic evidence of the latter.
Of course, dragonfly.
Oh, were using ‘Code’ now? Ok… Um Tom, do you like Jazz? Does Dragonfly like Jazz? Is Dragonfly actually a man? Do you wanna have brutish man-sex with him? Do you wanna Willy his Wonka? You can be Charlie is his Chocolate Factory…
…oh to dream, huh?
Dan, I have a feeling your homo-erotic pud-pouding soliloquy may be deleted soon.
The icy cold grip of censorship closes around us to stifle expression lest *gasp* someone be offended.
To hell with deleting posts. If I recall correctly, ‘not being offended’ is not constitutionally protected.
drax0r, forget not what HisGirl pointed out so eloquently last week, “…crude humor/remarks here on Tomas’ site don’t really speak highly of self-respect…or much respect for people like myself, who visit the site because we’re friends of Tomas’ also. Some of us don’t really appreciate being blasted with sexual references with every visit. Maybe some discretion might be in order?” I’m simply pointing out that the line has been crossed, despite the fact that this particular thread was begun by Tomas’ announcement of his proclivity towards *ahem* self-gratification. Yes he can delete posts, however, if it was his intention for the thread to go this direction from the onset, where does that leave you, danzig, HisGirl (which will probably not venture past his opening pud-pounding declaration), and myself?
If we must cater to the, well, uppermost threshold of what passes for decency then, at the very least, the suicide rate is going to go way up.
It strikes me as odd that the people who feel the most strongly about natural human (god given?) sexuality being indecent are the same ones so bent on making sure nobody else can enjoy it either.
If you don’t want to be a party to crude comments, sexual suggestions, and the like then I’m sure this fantastic website has a means of blocking users, or at worst, you can ignore us entirely, but I certainly resent any attempt to soften or block the content of my chosen means of expression as much or more as you resent being exposed to it.
So we can start posting graphic gay porn showing man-on-man penetration on your livejournal account, and you would celebrate it’s expression? Fantastic!
No, you simpleton, you’ve obviously missed the point completely. Again.
The point is that I wouldn’t delete a post because one or two people in the audience might find it questionable because the threshold of objectionable content of those few is not representative of the same threshold of the audience as a whole.
Decency, as a societal concept, represents community standards, not the standards of the most, or least, for that matter, sensitive members of our society.
I appreciate your assessment of my understanding. However, once again, YOU fail to realize that what you said above still just boils down to your acceptance of mass postings of explicit homo-erotic pornography on YOUR site. I guarantee you’d delete it! You preach something you would not practice.
At least you’re consistant. At missing the point. I’ll spell it out. Full-on man on man anal penetration would fall below community standards of decency and therefore would be deleted as such, not because one or two of my readers would be offended but because almost all of them would be.
So what you’re saying is you support not supporting something that you would normally support only because the vast majority supports you not supporting it regardless of the fact that you said you don’t care about the majority supporting you?
Correct. Sometimes certain personal sacrifices must be made to help grease the gears of society.
Excrement!
It’s my turn to be astounded by the great drax0r, even though I agree with Howton’s sentiment.
Dude, you’re the one that gave us the initial visual. And with that visual of you pleasuring yourself, you’ve probably lost a good third of your readership at the your initial posting. Not one of the three people I am thinking of will even venture this far, so you might say that your own entry was a self-fulfilling prophesy.
hey Tony,
who’d ya have in mind when you were talking about three people? You’re not trying to hook me up, are you?