June 24, 2006
-
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have…
Here we meet once again. Yes, it is true that I journeyed to a super-secret location. This time it was to the land of Snead. There, it is said, lives a great writer. Yes, it is true that this was not the original destination. That location cannot be disclosed at this time because it will be in the weeks and months to come one stop amongst many, if reason can be given for more stops or if a travel companion is to be found.
Greetings to all of you out there, especially to all of the new readers. It’s good to have you with us. I also want to extend a warm welcome to Emo Girl and remind everyone to leave her an encouraging comment from time to time.
I went to Snead to award a good friend of mine two cigars for the completion of the 7th draft of his novel. However, not only did he stay up all night Wednesday, but all day Thursday as well. Therefore, when I arrived at his house at 1830 Thursday, I was greeted with the news from his mother that he had just given up the ghost as it were and would probably be retired for quite some time. Thusly, I proceeded to the next stop.
Yes, I paid a call to dear old Pumblechook himself. They were all rather pleased to see me. For the first time he saw the new and improved Pimpmobile. To say the least he liked it and I dare say he was more reservedly proud.
Whilst old news to me, my sister got a laptop. It is a Centrino Duo with a gig of RAM. I’m jealous. As soon as I get caught up on the bills, I do believe that I will purchase one too, though it would probably be wise to wait until I know for a fact that I am going back to school in the fall. That is to say, I do not know if the appeal has went through or not. Secretly, I’m hoping that it doesn’t go through.
Travels to Mossflower
For dinner, we had sloppy Joes whilst we watched an episode of Poirot. Afterwards, they all headed to bed. I stayed up and read several chapters in Mossflower; I am convinced tat despite the British TV series, I should contact Brian Jacques and talk to him about pitching the series to Pixar. It was upon reading:You can call my home your own, for you and your mice, as long as you like, and please don’t thank me—you’d do exactly the same for me if I needed shelter. In fact you did, many years ago when I was young and liked to travel.
that I thought it wise to stop and record my thoughts.
A very good friend of mine (the Cullmanite from the Happy Insured Mortorist Day article) recently got back from a short missions trip to Germany. In fact, we should all encourage him to post about it as he promised me he would. (For those of you in Juanita, that means go leave him comments threatening harm if he doesn’t post.) Perhaps he’ll even do a Q & A.
Our conversation (stormreaver and me) was Wednesday afternoon. He said that no matter what he ate over there, it was infinitely better then anything Stateside. This made me do two things: want to get something from Ol’ Heidelberg (the jager schnitzel was to die for!) and made me reminisce about my experience abroad, both in and out of the country. I then formulated a plan: go from place to place, both in and out of the country, jobbing as I go.
For example, let’s say I wanted to go to Kalamazoo, MI. I leave here (though I think I would retain the apartment) and arrive in Kalamazoo. Upon arrival, I’d find a job, hopefully one that is related to the culture, but nevertheless a way to make money. Perhaps I’d even write ahead to the local papers and put an ad in the classifieds that I am looking for a family to stay with. I would need money to make the car payments, etc. How I paid from room and board would be negotiable. It could be that I trade my mad skilz/manual labor or, of course, cash rent. After I’ve seen the country, I’d try the same abroad.
Of course, if I were smart, I’d by a still camera and perhaps the DVX-100 to help with documentation, along with a laptop for editing and Internet connectivity. *chuckles* That makes me think of the Coke commercials where the kids go off making the documentary as they travel across the country.
Upon thinking on this for a couple of days, I thought it could also be fun to try this with a girlfriend of sorts. To say the least, the sex would be amazing and we’d never lack for entertainment. Oh to dream!
Of course, this, like most of my better ideas is highly impracticable at best, though I expect that Howton will encourage this behavior as he is a firm believer in knowledge by experience vs. knowledge by study.
Comments (24)
‘I do not know if the appeal has went through or not.’ Either — but if they’re offering remedial English, do everthing you can to get in
As to impracti ? cable – Only if you insist on keeping the apt. – if you’re gonna travel the world, you won’t need that expensive anchor.Then it might be do-able.
Come on – IM the secret destination – who lobes ya baby?
I was thinking that if they ever ban smokeless tobacco like they have cigarettes at the workplace or public places like restaurants, I’m going to invent a tobacco suppository – the lining of the anus is soft, like the mouth and it should therefore be easily absorbed. I’m brilliant! Of course that could lead to the worldwide epidemic of ass cancer…
I used to live near Kalamazoo, MI. What a weird name for a town…
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H
I got a gal in Kalamazoo
Don?’t want to boast but I know she?’s the toast of Kalamazoo-zoo, zoo, zoo, zoo, zoo…
d00d! crack kilz
I have no idea what you guys are babbling about, but it sounds like fun.
… I’m confuzzled about the whole thing, but no matter.
I’ve decided that when I get back to the States, I need to read Mossflower again. Excellent book … excellent …
And I say ‘Congratulations’ to ANYONE who made it to their seventh draft. I’d give up by the third, definitely. Actually, didn’t I just do that? …
Anyways, hello from your rambling friend!
God bless,
Shohna
i need your insight again if you dont mind??!?!?:)
i am not a slut. and for some reason his guy friends knew about me it was just the girls that didnt’ know. and friends with benefits nasty i hate that whole expression…:( getting the apartment is just so scary and i felt safe with him. i guess the relationship can still work from us living apart….i mean if its meant to be and is strong enough it wouldn’t matter right? cause like i said i can still spend the night there and i can still do dinner there etc….right???
I’ve started packing my own ass with long-cut moist snuff as a test. It tingles.
Tom, What? You don’t like Andy Williams? I didn’t realize I was insulting anyone!
) Would it insult you if I just kept it the way it is? Yes, send me the file and I’ll listen to it…can’t make any promises though. Have a good day! Granny
actually the audition is a band. if you liked figt club i would recomment the movie snatch if you havent seen it
was your comment about the vindication one of sarcasm? i cant think of what you mean..
btw, if a dummy doll is a nice replacement for me, maybe u should try out the dummy….
well i did ask for your advie i know but it was just harsh to read the straight up truth i guess is all. i’ve read n read over your comments and that they are true, they still hurt knowing that is what he’s doing. him being at my doorstep every night beggin to be let in is something i highly doubt will happen. those hoes n slutbags are exactly that….i wish i could post their pics up so everyone could see….what trash they are and they are disgusting and ugly and unattractive c’mon they brag about being locked up in jail for hitting a bouncer at a bar…meanwhile they have a kid at home….it just makes me sick. i do have a brain cell hahahaha…
Sorry for not being online when you were the other night…my laptop has been taken away from me, temporarily, so I rarely have the means to actually come online. Sorry. :-/
and i doubt you’ll get around to this traveling fantasy if you wait on all factors(*cough*the girlfriend part*cough*). haha. kidding. but seriously…
i need it banged into my head ! that it is the right thing…so yes please chew twice!!!! and thanks i look forward to the ho ho’s!:)
It was too a joke. You don’t know him.
ok now ur insulting me by callin me a ho?
Suppose that Fred says to you: “The fastest swimming stroke is the front crawl. One performs the front crawl by oscillating the legs at the hip, and moving the arms in an approximately circular motion”. Here, Fred has propositional knowledge of swimming and how to perform the front crawl.
However, if Fred acquired this propositional knowledge from an encyclopedia, he will not have acquired the skill of swimming: he has some propositional knowledge, but does not have any procedural knowledge or “know-how”. In general, one can demonstrate know-how by performing the task in question, but it is harder to demonstrate propositional knowledge. Michael Polanyi popularised the term tacit knowledge to distinguish the ability to do something from the ability to describe how to do something. Gilbert Ryle had previously made a similar point in discussing the characteristics of intelligence. His ideas are summed up in the aphorism “efficient practice precedes the theory of it”. Someone with the ability to perform the appropriate moves is said to be able to swim, even if that person cannot precisely identify what it is he does in order to swim. This distinction is often traced back to Plato, who used the term techne or skill for know-how, and the term episteme for a more robust kind of knowledge in which claims can be true or false.
Western philosophers for centuries have distinguished between two kinds of knowledge: a priori and a posteriori knowledge.
A priori knowledge is knowledge gained or justified by reason alone, without the direct or indirect influence of any particular experience (here, experience usually means observation of the world through sense perception. See Rationalism, below, for clarification.)
A posteriori knowledge is any other sort of knowledge; that is, knowledge the attainment or justification of which requires reference to experience. This is also called empirical knowledge.
One of the fundamental questions in epistemology is whether there is any non-trivial a priori knowledge. Generally speaking rationalists believe that there is, while empiricists believe that all non trivial knowledge is ultimately derived from some kind of external experience.
The a priori / a posteriori distinction is often thought to map onto the distinction between synthetic and analytic propositions. Doubt was cast onto this distinction by the American philosopher W.V.O Quine, and it is now commonly recognised that the two distinctions are not co-extentional.
Rationalists believe that there are a priori or innate ideas that are not derived from sense experience. These ideas, however, may be justified by experience. These ideas may in some way derive from the structure of the human mind, or they may exist independently of the mind. If they exist independently, they may be understood by a human mind once it reaches a necessary degree of sophistication.
The epitome of the rationalist view is Descartes’ Cogito ergo sum (“I think, therefore I am”), in which the skeptic is invited to consider that the mere fact that he doubts this claim implies that there is a doubter. Because doubting is a kind of thinking, the claim must be correct. Spinoza derived a rationalist system in which there is only one substance, God. Leibniz derived a system in which there are an infinite number of substances, his Monads.
and the point of that was?…
I expect that Howton will encourage this behavior as he is a firm believer in knowledge by experience vs. knowledge by study.
a mere lesson in nomeclature then, huh?
Tom, did you even read what he’d written? It’s not a “mere lesson in nomenclature” rather the justification of your lifelong journey immersing yourself in the study of empirical knowledge! He has freed you! Go for it buddy! Hooray!
a mere lesson in nomeclature then, huh?….*eyeroll*