June 11, 2010
-
Defeat Harry Reid, Support Sharron Angle!
We should all send her $10. I mean, is two coffees at Starbucks too high a price to pay to defeat Harry Reid? Hat tip Twice Right.
We should all send her $10. I mean, is two coffees at Starbucks too high a price to pay to defeat Harry Reid? Hat tip Twice Right.
Comments (24)
You’re argument is not very convincing
@ehowton – That’s not surprising. You don’t even use the right form of “your.” How could I expect you to understand the more complicated issue of the need to unseat Harry Reid?
@ProfessorTom - Your counter-argument even less so.
@ehowton - Why do you support Harry Reid for Senate?
@ProfessorTom - Because he’s articulate. His politics be damned – if you can’t express yourself or get your ideas across, you don’t deserve a senate seat.
Harry Reid is a terrible leader. If Nevada puts him back in office it’ll get what it deserves.
@ehowton - Hitler was articulate. A passionate leader with a gift for speech-making. By your current argument for Reid you’d consider Hitler viable.
@JJ_Ames - Over ProfessorTom? Yes. It takes more than “Hope” to lead a nation – it takes a plan, and a plan in your head doesn’t do anyone any good. It needs to be communicated. Never underestimate the power of effective communication.
Obama told us it was time for change without telling us *how* exactly. By your current argument for ProfessorTom you’d consider Obama viable.
@ehowton - Lookit, I’m adding to an on-going discussion here. The world does not start and stop at your whims. If you can’t keep up with the conversation, perhaps it’s best that you not try to join in at all.
@JJ_Ames - Don’t feed the troll. Clearly ehowton doesn’t understand how politics works and would rather have a smooth talker in office instead of someone that believes in the Constitution.
@ProfessorTom - If you were the smartest man in the world and believed wholeheartedly in the direct enforcement of the Constitution and against big government – HOW WOULD ANYONE KNOW if you’re unable to tell them? “I have ideas and shit” is about as effective as Obama’s “Hope” campaign as I pointed out above. And telling me that I don’t understand how politics works because you can’t explain yourself? Sometime I forget you’re as stupid on your own blog as you are on everyone else’s. I think I will take your other advice and ‘not join in at all.’ I love having great, intelligent arguments and conversations with you as equally as I hate how fucking stupid you get when you’re like this. You are the WORST proponent for small-government I’ve ever run across. You give every one of us a bad name with your attitude.
@ehowton - Why is it so difficult for you to click one link and look at her website? Are you retarded or something? Are you waiting for a government program to do it for you? How is it that you can’t Google of late?
Really, your stupidity is as taxing as Obama’s agenda. But hey, you’re more than welcome to send your donation to Harry Reid. Just don’t get pissy when I point to the FEC reports when you do.
@ProfessorTom - I forgot that you have no opinions of your own – all I have to do is google it and decide which one you’d choose. You’re such a tool.
@ehowton - I do have opinions of my own. Just because I don’t write War and Peace on every post I make fully justifying every thought I’ve had on a topic (and when I do, you don’t bother to comment) doesn’t mean that I don’t have an opinion on the matter.
The fact that there is someone who is a Tea Party conservative that won their primary and is now in the general election against Harry Reid excites me, so much so, that in addition to my donation (because I put my money where my mouth is unlike you) I am encouraging others to help save this great nation by sending Harry Reid job hunting come November.
But since you want opinions and sources, I’ll site your own words:
what do we do with the kids? Well, since we’re paying $4000 annually for school taxes whether they go or not, perhaps we should send them there? I dunno, there’s like 1000 reasons people don’t homeschool, and I’m sure it seems pretty self-explanatory to them, too.
When your own children have their nose up your ass every 8-seconds for ten years, you’ll get down on your knees and thank God for the quiet moments when they’re doing just that. Empirical data is a whore, but she never lies.
Instead of being outraged that the Federal government is meddling in education which is a STATE issue you willingly play along and let the government babysit your kids for eight hours a day, five days a week simply because you don’t want to take responsibility for what you have fathered. If you were the proponent of limited government that you claim to be, you’d be out protesting and working to elect people who would eliminate this tax burden–-people like Les Phillip that believe that the tax dollars should follow the child wherever they go to school; that parents should have a choice where their kids attend school that is not solely based on the location of the parent’s dwelling place.
When you take the beam out of your own eye, THEN you can help me come take the moat out of mine.
@ProfessorTom - didn’t realize it was a troll, my bad.
@JJ_Ames - He does this from time to time.
@JJ_Ames - I run a very active city-wide forum and we get trolls from time to time. You can usually identify one by their inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic discussions. I would go so far as to say that is just about the opposite, on all counts, of what I was attempting here, though our host (and to a lesser degree, you) appear to be guilty of all three.
@ProfessorTom - That’s an excellent example, and when you have children of your own, you and I can discuss the finer points of public education while you laugh uproariously at some 20s-something punk who’s single and thinks he knows better than you despite the fact that you’ve *actually* raised children and he hasn’t. Bookmark this so you and I can reflect on it and laugh in a couple of years.
I promise not to ever think I know more about being an unsuccessful pizza-deliver guy than you if you promise to not ever presume to know more about raising children than me. Deal?
@ehowton - The discussion had nothing to do with raising children and everything to do with condoning big government by yielding to their 8 hour a day, 5 days a week baby service.
Focus.
@ProfessorTom - The point was (and I should know since I wrote the goddamn thing) is that her logic behind why I send my kids to public school isn’t about being told what to do, rather actually discovering its true worth. Its impossible for you to discover what I’m talking about through logic, or texts. Its something you have to experience yourself.
You’ve been to sign-toting protests and tea-parties before, I haven’t. Notice how I never try to tell you what it was you experienced at those events?
There’s no fucking way I could force you, through logic or my opinion, to experience something you did not. You and you alone were there, and your experiences were recorded from your own perspective – not mine! It would be foolish of me to try to tell you that you experienced something differently than you did – yet you continually presume to do just that with me.
Looking back on the last several years, its probably this alone that makes me think your brain is broken. I mean every single person I have ever interacted with on many different levels understands this. Except you. Why is that?
@ehowton - Your lack of logic is sickening. This “I didn’t experience it, so it doesn’t exist” proposition is juvenile. If you have to touch the hot stove to find out if it’s hot or not, be my guest. Just don’t bitch to me when you burn yourself.
For the record, you have again strayed from the topic: big government vs. limited government. Thus far, you still argue in support of bigger government.
Its astounding how much of what I’ve said you’ve misunderstood, but I’ll go with your incorrect analogy:
I touch the stove. Its fucking hot. You’ve never touched a stove before in your life, but since it doesn’t look hot, you try to tell me that it wasn’t, despite the fact that I was the one who experienced it.
You went to a tea-party. You got to experience a bunch of things. I didn’t go, so I don’t try to tell you what experiences you had – you know! You were there! If I tried to tell you otherwise, I would come off as a stupid asshole, and rightfully so!
I have children. You don’t. I experience the weight of responsibility for someone other than just myself. You don’t, but you try to tell me that I put my children into public schools because I support big government. You come off as a stupid asshole.
Are ya there yet?
@ehowton - Are you out protesting government involvement in education? NO. Do you send your kids off to be babysat by Uncle Sam? Yes. Ergo, you support big government. Silence is consent.
Test: You barely make enough money to pay your bills on time each month. Imagine you have two children you had to support on top of that. You’d have to get a second job to do it, but that would mean no time for protesting the government. HOWEVER, you would be able to feed your children. What do you do?
Bonus round: Pretending you choose to feed your kids - some douchebag on the internet in a different life position than you accuses you of arguing for big government because you choose to work to feed your kids. How do you react? Obviously you’re working and not on welfare – is the douchebag on the internet an ignorant prick or just someone who lacks the life experience you have and how do you tell the difference?
@ehowton - The difference here is that I don’t have kids nor have I made any. Furthermore, having kids isn’t justification for turning them over to the government for 40 hours a week.